Radeon 6800 mac os

Использование модуля MPX Radeon Pro W6800X в Mac Pro

Узнайте о различных вариантах установки дисплеев при использовании модуля MPX на компьютере Mac Pro (2019 г.).

В состав модуля MPX Radeon Pro W6800X входит графический процессор AMD Radeon Pro W6800X с 32 ГБ памяти GDDR6, четырьмя портами Thunderbolt 3 и одним портом HDMI 2.0. С помощью портов Thunderbolt 3 можно подключать дисплеи и внешние устройства к Mac Pro, а порты Thunderbolt 3 на верхней* и задней панелях Mac Pro позволяют подключать дополнительные дисплеи.

Если для запуска Windows используется приложение Boot Camp и устанавливаются сторонние видеокарты AMD, могут потребоваться другие драйверы AMD.

Сведения о портах и шинах

Модуль MPX оснащен двумя шинами для своих портов Thunderbolt 3. При подключении двух дисплеев 5K или 6K к портам Thunderbolt 3 на модуле MPX следует подключать по одному дисплею на шину.

При подключении дисплея к порту HDMI на модуле MPX порты Thunderbolt 3 на шине 0 могут поддерживать один дополнительный дисплей с разрешением 4K или меньше. Если необходимо вывести звук на дисплей, подключенный к порту HDMI, при наличии других дисплеев, подключенных через Thunderbolt 3, не подключайте дисплей к порту Thunderbolt 3 рядом с портом HDMI.

Подключение дисплеев к одному модулю MPX Radeon Pro W6800X

Если установлен один модуль MPX Radeon Pro W6800X, с помощью портов Thunderbolt 3 можно подключить до шести дисплеев в следующих конфигурациях.

Три дисплея Pro Display XDR с разрешением 6016 x 3384 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Один дисплей к шине 0
• Один дисплей к шине 1
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на верхней* или задней панели (плата ввода-вывода Apple) компьютера Mac

Три дисплея 5K с разрешением 5120 x 2880 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Один дисплей к шине 0
• Один дисплей к шине 1
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на верхней* или задней панели (плата ввода-вывода Apple) компьютера Mac

Шесть дисплеев 4K с разрешением 3840 x 2160 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Два дисплея к шине 0
• Два дисплея к шине 1
• Два дисплея, подключенных к портам Thunderbolt 3 на верхней* или задней панели (плата ввода-вывода Apple) компьютера Mac

Подключение дисплеев к двум модулям MPX Radeon Pro W6800X

Если установлено два модуля MPX Radeon Pro W6800X, с помощью портов Thunderbolt 3 можно подключить до двенадцати дисплеев в следующих конфигурациях.

Шесть дисплеев Pro Display XDR с разрешением 6016 x 3384 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Два дисплея: по одному к шине 0 каждой платы
• Два дисплея: по одному к шине 1 каждой платы
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на верхней панели* компьютера Mac
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на задней панели (плата ввода-вывода Apple) компьютера Mac

Шесть дисплеев 5K с разрешением 5120 x 2880 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Два дисплея: по одному к шине 0 каждой платы
• Два дисплея: по одному к шине 1 каждой платы
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на верхней панели* компьютера Mac
• Один дисплей, подключенный к порту Thunderbolt 3 на задней панели (плата ввода-вывода Apple) компьютера Mac

Двенадцать дисплеев 4K с разрешением 3840 x 2160 при частоте 60 Гц при подключении следующим образом:

• Один дисплей к каждому порту Thunderbolt 3

Подключение соединения Infinity Fabric

Если установлено два модуля MPX Radeon Pro W6800X, их можно подключить с помощью соединения Infinity Fabric для повышения производительности и скорости передачи данных между графическими процессорами.

1. Снимите колпачки с каждого модуля MPX.
2. Выровняйте разъемы моста соединения Infinity Fabric с разъемами на модулях MPX, а затем медленно вдавите их.
3. С помощью крестообразной отвертки заверните оба винта, чтобы зафиксировать это положение.

Мост соединения Infinity Fabric для модуля MPX Radeon Pro W6800X (модель A2666) несовместим с модулями MPX предыдущего поколения.

Если используется Boot Camp и установлен мост соединения Infinity Fabric, нельзя подключать дисплеи с помощью портов Thunderbolt 3 на шине 1 и на верхней панели* компьютера Mac Pro.

Источник

Big Sur 11.1 with RX 6800

Matic

Tomorrow I will try and install Big Sur 11.1 because of the RX 6800 drivers.
I’m completely new to hackintoshing, is it even possible at this time with this hardware?

Gigabyte Z490 Vision D
i9 10900k
128 GB HyperX Predator 3600 MHz RAM
Powercolor Radeon RX 6800 AMD
Gigabyte Titan Ridge Thunderbolt 3
Fenvi T919 wireless
Corsair mp600 1 TB
LG 5k ultrafine

johnvid

Tomorrow I will try and install Big Sur 11.1 because of the RX 6800 drivers.
I’m completely new to hackintoshing, is it even possible at this time with this hardware?

Gigabyte Z490 Vision D
i9 10900k
128 GB HyperX Predator 3600 MHz RAM
Powercolor Radeon RX 6800 AMD
Gigabyte Titan Ridge Thunderbolt 3
Fenvi T919 wireless
Corsair mp600 1 TB

I see you have 128GB. Where are you planning to use this hackintosh for?

This hardware is frequently used in recent hackintosh builds. Only the RX 6800 has not been succesfully done.

Matic

Matic

I see you have 128GB. Where are you planning to use this hackintosh for?

This hardware is frequently used in recent hackintosh builds. Only the RX 6800 has not been succesfully done.

johnvid

It probably won’t.

I also want to build a new hackintosh. But I’m still not sure what hardware I want to use.

Could build exactly the same hardware you mention or wait for beginning next year. And hope Intel Rocket Lake is even much faster and capable of hackintosh.

Matic

It probably won’t.

I also want to build a new hackintosh. But I’m still not sure what hardware I want to use.

Could build exactly the same hardware you mention or wait for beginning next year. And hope Intel Rocket Lake is even much faster and capable of hackintosh.

Faster4Run

Greetings from Jpn.

MeToo — I decided to go the Rocket-Lake world — rather than the comet-Lake world.
The reason why I should wait for coming Rocket-Lake, is to get the high speed I/O capability with PCIe 4.0.
It is very sad for me that AMD has already provided the world of PCIe 4.0 — but the Interl is so slow (and sleeping ?) to provide us the PCIe 4.0 world.

There is some benefit the change ( from RX 570 to RX 5700 XT , but it is a small point for me.
Just dreaming to utilize the monster power of PowerCOlor RX6800 XT ( triple slot board-body ) on the Rocke-Lake matherboard.

I really woul like to ask you — pls «Keep us posted».

Faster4Run

One more thing — about my Hacintosh environment for your information.

Bootloader : Opencore 0.6.4 with significant kexts, drivers, ACPIs
Establised and using macoS : Big Sur 11.1 beta, and Catalina.7
Display: EIZO EV2750 ( vertical style )

Matic

Greetings from Jpn.

MeToo — I decided to go the Rocket-Lake world — rather than the comet-Lake world.
The reason why I should wait for coming Rocket-Lake, is to get the high speed I/O capability with PCIe 4.0.
It is very sad for me that AMD has already provided the world of PCIe 4.0 — but the Interl is so slow (and sleeping ?) to provide us the PCIe 4.0 world.

There is some benefit the change ( from RX 570 to RX 5700 XT , but it is a small point for me.
Just dreaming to utilize the monster power of PowerCOlor RX6800 XT ( triple slot board-body ) on the Rocke-Lake matherboard.

I really woul like to ask you — pls «Keep us posted».

Источник

MP All Models AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT / 6900 XT for macOS?

Xenobius

macrumors member

MisterAndrew

macrumors 68020

Matt Tomlinson

macrumors newbie

flowrider

macrumors 604

^^^^Actually not true. That thread was started three years ago. If you go to the last page you’ll see mention of «Big Navi» which is the RX6800XT and RX6900XT.

AMD’s ‘Big Navi’ Radeon RX 6900 XT will challenge the best of the NVIDIA RTX 30 series with 80 CUs, 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and over 2 GHz clock speeds

pmiles

macrumors 6502a

DFP1989

macrumors 6502

MisterAndrew

macrumors 68020

DFP1989

macrumors 6502

That’s what I mean.

And the Mac Pro has quite a few years of support in it yet, I can’t see them not offering new GPUs for it as AMD releases new cards. They made a big deal about the modularity, and already released a few new cards since launch.

I’d be stunned if they aren’t working with prototypes of these new cards.

deconstruct60

macrumors G3

That’s what I mean.

And the Mac Pro has quite a few years of support in it yet, I can’t see them not offering new GPUs for it as AMD releases new cards. They made a big deal about the modularity, and already released a few new cards since launch.

All of which had a Mac with an embedded Mac attached to them.

The Mac Pro has an edge on the «done enbedded in a pervious Mac» rule where the new GPU is largely out of the scope of what the other Mac product enclosures can handle. The notion though that non Apple eGPU enclosures are driving more open GPU card validation or that open PCI-e slots in the Mac Pro 2019 are going to drive broader 3rd party card validations is probably limited. If Apple is doing it anyway then the support falls out to a set set of these «other implementation» cards that build off the same reference design.

The Mac Pro 2019 means they don’t really need prototypes. They could just have an AMD reference board in the system to do driver development ramp work. Apple doesn’t have to built custom prototypes to evaluate new ADM GPU chip packages much anymore.

A prototype suggestive that Apple will ship a 6xxx class MPX module in 2020 and close to wrapping up the final production specifications for the MPX module. Actually I’d be surprised by that. That is probably deeper into 2021 than many who are highly excited about the 6xxx series probably expect.

First, there are rumors that Apple asked for custom variants of the implementation. AMD’s has other high priority products too. Mainstream models and pragmatically also the initialize launches of the console GPU (really APUs but relatively big GPUs attached .) . Apple probably wants custom and also a big discount so probably not first in line.

Anytime the other Mac Products having «laid the foudation» for the driver line of development the roll out is slow. The W5700X was coming real soon now for months after the Mac Pro launch. Same thing , different day likey for 6xxxx series also if it is not also popping up in an iMac Pro or something further down the line-up to boost the development priority order.

The iMacs picking up 5700 chip variants probably means Apple is in a monetize phase on tracking GPUs. Not really in a big hurry to peak new R&D costs.

P.S. a cherry on top for the delay of adoption would be a Mac oriented Apple GPU that soaks up more, but limited R&D resources on graphics stack driver development and testing. Apple added new Metal features for the GPU in the A14 and are likely to do the same for the Mac laptop GPU if it is incrementally different. All of that likely will slow work on 3rd party solutions incrementally. Apple will do ‘something’ with the Mac PRo 2019 MPX modules over time. Speed isn’t a likely primary criteria though.

pmiles

macrumors 6502a

That’s what I mean.

And the Mac Pro has quite a few years of support in it yet, I can’t see them not offering new GPUs for it as AMD releases new cards. They made a big deal about the modularity, and already released a few new cards since launch.

I’d be stunned if they aren’t working with prototypes of these new cards.

Apple is in the business of SELLING hardware, not making it easier for you to UPGRADE hardware. If they can lure you to buy their next greatest box because it comes with X processor or GPU, they will do everything in their power to encourage it. to the point of letting their existing hardware stagnate. The Trash Can was the perfect example of a system designed to get you to replace it (and it was designed for professional usage). iMac Pro. ditto. Latest Mac Pro. sad to say it. yeppers. unless you intend to turn it into a Hackintosh going forward.

If you really want the freedom to rebuild your machine whenever a new toy hits the market, the PC platform has it in spades. Apple is going to try and circumvent you every step of the way on a Mac. Unless Apple sells a box with said GPU in it, odds are more likely it will never get supported or poorly supported.

AND if you believe some system is in the pipes that will use the new GPUs. remember this. the new iMacs that shipped with the 5700XT weren’t supported in Big Sur beta and had glitches that had to be pushed in a unique update for that system alone. So the theory that something in the works translates to support prior to official release is a farce.

macrumors 65816

Apple is in the business of SELLING hardware, not making it easier for you to UPGRADE hardware. If they can lure you to buy their next greatest box because it comes with X processor or GPU, they will do everything in their power to encourage it. to the point of letting their existing hardware stagnate. The Trash Can was the perfect example of a system designed to get you to replace it (and it was designed for professional usage). iMac Pro. ditto. Latest Mac Pro. sad to say it. yeppers. unless you intend to turn it into a Hackintosh going forward.

If you really want the freedom to rebuild your machine whenever a new toy hits the market, the PC platform has it in spades. Apple is going to try and circumvent you every step of the way on a Mac. Unless Apple sells a box with said GPU in it, odds are more likely it will never get supported or poorly supported.

AND if you believe some system is in the pipes that will use the new GPUs. remember this. the new iMacs that shipped with the 5700XT weren’t supported in Big Sur beta and had glitches that had to be pushed in a unique update for that system alone. So the theory that something in the works translates to support prior to official release is a farce.

DFP1989

macrumors 6502

The W5700X didn’t have an iMac cousin when it was announced or released. W5500 is a relative of that line of GPUs.

That’s certainly not the pitch they made with the 2019 Mac Pro, and I would be surprised if they didn’t offer a W6900X at some point.

deconstruct60

macrumors G3

Reference boards ship all the time.

AMD add-in-board partners showcase their reference Radeon RX 5700 models — VideoCardz.com

DFP1989

macrumors 6502

Xenobius

macrumors member

AMD Unveils Three Powerful Radeon RX 6000 Series Big Navi Cards To Topple NVIDIA’s Best

ssgbryan

macrumors 65816

I wouldn’t be holding your breath for one of these for the Mac Pro. Remember — Apple will have to design a board for the chip because Apple went with MPX connector.

I’ll be picking up a 6800 for my PC on Black Friday. 😁

deconstruct60

macrumors G3

The MPX bay design accepts regular GPU add in cards just fine. It also has a two 8 pin molex connections which can power 300W just fine too.

There is about nothing that Apple needs to build custom here to work on graphics driver software at all.

A down-clocked 6800 would probably work more than reasonably well in a speed bumped iMac Pro. (speed bump the Thunderbolt v3 controllers and would pair nices with the XDR monitors ) . There is no MPX hurdles to jump there either.

There isn’t a humongus leap either from the baseline W5700X design either. GPUs packages are a different size but the power delivery/conditioning is a bit different . 16GB of VRAM. in both cases. 256-bit bus in both cases . so layout changes minimal.

The aspect of the MPX module directly associated with the MPX connectro don’t have to change at all if just keep the same two Thunderbolt v3 controllers on the modules. The PCI-e and USB feeds are the same. The DisplayPort v1.4 outflow is the same too. In that context there is abosolutely nothing ‘new’ to design there. ( might be some minor trace reflow to do but it almost exactly «same stuff , different day».

The large time sink here is likely doing the software drivers and that can be largely be driven with a reference card ‘test mule’.

The big blockers for Apple are far less technical. First, motivation to do work. ( if going into another Mac then more motivation. If the whole Navi 21 family is just Mac Pro then ‘kick to can’ ). Second , Price. AMD is going to be able to sell every last drop of any working die here. Nvidia is blocked on supply (rampant product shortages ) . AMD has gobs of other 7nm parts to get out. Apple probaly wants some Scrooge McDuck discount price that AMD will just chuckle at for more than several months. Pretty likely Apple is at the end of the line for supply demand also.
( and the 6900 in particular is likely the binned , of the binned , of the binned dies. Kind of doubt that will make a MPX module just on pricing just won’t fall much. )

If they are around. AMD’s supply may be better than Nvidia’s for the next 4-5 weeks but doubtful there is going to be gobs of excess. AMD sent out emails/notifications to suppliers to restrict to one-per-customer to avoid shortages.
AMD has pushed the 6900 back to probably free up some supply, but it isn’t like nobody wants these so the demand will be initally low.

Источник