Создание службы Windows с использованием Python

Введение

Примеры

Скрипт Python, который можно запустить как сервис

Модули , используемые в данном примере , являются частью pywin32 (Python для расширений Windows). В зависимости от того, как вы установили Python, вам может потребоваться установить его отдельно.

Это просто шаблон. Код вашего приложения, вероятно, вызывающий отдельный скрипт, будет идти в функцию main ().

Вам также нужно будет установить это как сервис. Лучшее решение для этого в данный момент , как представляется, использовать Non-сосущий Service Manager . Это позволяет установить службу и предоставляет графический интерфейс для настройки командной строки, которую выполняет служба. Для Python вы можете сделать это, что создает сервис за один раз:

Где my_script.py — это приведенный выше шаблон сценария, измененный для вызова сценария приложения или кода в функции main (). Обратите внимание, что сервис не запускает скрипт Python напрямую, он запускает интерпретатор Python и передает ему основной скрипт в командной строке.

В качестве альтернативы вы можете использовать инструменты, предоставленные в Windows Server Resource Kit для вашей версии операционной системы, поэтому создайте службу.

Запуск веб-приложения Flask в качестве службы

Это вариант общего примера. Вам просто нужно импортировать приложение сценарий и вызвать это run() метод в сервисе main() функции. В этом случае мы также используем многопроцессорной модуль из — за проблемы с доступом WSGIRequestHandler .

Взято из https://codecamp.ru/a/25130524/318488

Синтаксис

Параметры

Примечания

Научим основам Python и Data Science на практике

Это не обычный теоритический курс, а онлайн-тренажер, с практикой на примерах рабочих задач, в котором вы можете учиться в любое удобное время 24/7. Вы получите реальный опыт, разрабатывая качественный код и анализируя реальные данные.

your Python Window Manager

Kindly hosted by Sourceforge

31.3.2006: Suggestions for feature enhancements wanted! Note that packaging (debianizing especially) is being worked on. Please join pywm-talk@users.sf.net and shoot.

26.3.2006: New release with better docs and smarter window placement (whoa, something new 😉

19.3.2006: A new release with more code cleaning

13.3.2006: Some maintaining already done =), mainly cleaning and some minor bugs and a new release, see below.

27.2.2006: A new maintainer: Elmo Mдntynen (that’s me) is going to try to do some maintaining on pywm, mainly helping interested people and bug hunting, but is hoping to do some developing also. A new release has been made already, see below.

8/3/2005: I’m currently concentrating on figuring out how to write the event catcher portion of PyWM, as I think that it is the most immediately useful, and doesn’t require much from the other portions to be useful.

6/28/2005: PyWM has recently had a change of developers: After two years of no activity on the project, David has offered the Sourceforge admin/developer stick to Jon Wilson.

Jon intends to (not sure if this is going to happen, Jon has been busy) largely rewrite the window manager, using the current PyWM codebase as a jumping off point. See Design Philosophy.

What’s PYWM?

PYWM is a small, simple python-programmable X window manager that’s packed with features, yet very easy to learn and use. It gives you easy-to-use tools to create your own personal dream desktop. Control Freak Heaven.

Some window managers are mouse heaven and keyboard hell. Other window managers are the other way around.
But PYWM aims to be very comfortable to use from either .

At the moment PYWM is a «pythonised» version of the fast and light FLWM window manager, but it migth grow up and lose all the c(++) code.

So What Can I Do With It?

I’ve seen dozens of window managers in my time.

At one extreme are the morbidly obese KDE and Gnome desktops, which can take longer to fire up than Linux itself! One wonders if development of these two projects is funded by manufacturers of memory and hard disks :p

At the other extreme are hard-core ‘minimalist’ window managers like ‘LWM’ and ‘TWM’, which can be very functionality-challenged, or have some annoying quirks. For example, one WM I tried requires you to hold down the ALT key while using the mouse within a window!

On the fringes are ‘rodentophobic’ window managers like Matchbox, RatPoison, Ion etc. One thinks of certain people (who will go nameless) who take pride in still using ASCII dumb terminals.

On the advanced end of the spectrum is the wonderful LISP-driven ‘Sawfish’ window manager.

But PyWM is aimed at the middle ground. On one hand, it’s easy to set up magickal key bindings to do pretty much what you want. But on the other hand, it’s also comfortable and courteous for mouse users. I find myself often switching from mouse/keyboard to straight keyboard, so PyWM is there for me all the way.

And, above all, it’s built to support easy customisation in Python, the world’s coolest programming language.

Design Philosophy

The window manager itself should have four main components:

• a program which catches all events from the X server and sends them on to be handled. This would be in C, for speed as well as closer interaction with X. Since this should be quite simple, the relative difficulty of changing it (as compared to parts written in python or other scripting languages) would not be an issue.
• a set of scripts, probably in python, that actually handle the events caught by the above. This is where the bulk of what distinguishes one window manager from another occurs. Python is chosen so that the behavior of the window manager is easily changed by the user on the fly. Also, using a full scale programming language as configuration means that the window manager can be configured in ways that the developers never dreamed of.
• a bare-bones window management server which manages the windows (takes care of placing them, resizing them, etc.) as well as doing various virtual desktop/multiple desktop stuff. This would probably be written in C as well, for the same reasons.
• a client library which includes functions to control the server, and to return requested information from the server to the clients. It would communicate with the server by means of a unix domain socket. This would be similar to sawfish-client from the sawfish window manager, but would be implemented as a shared library rather than a LISP interpreter. Various language bindings to this library would be provided by means of swig or pyrex or a similar tool. Most likely swig, as I’m familiar with it, and it provides support for a large number of popular languages.

This will be made EWMH and ICCCM compliant. Then it will be able to be used underneath gnome, kde, etc.

The window manager will NOT implement:

• menus
• toolbars
• docks
• panels
• desktop pagers
• a GUI toolkit
• configuration dialogs
• whathaveyou

These would all be separate programs and/or scripts and/or libraries.

When the event catcher gets an event, it would spawn a new thread, and go back to listening for new events (spawning a new thread to actually handle the events means that we can get back to listening much more quickly, which would hopefully improve the system’s responsiveness.). The new thread would then start the python interpreter, calling a function to actually handle the event. Anything from this point would be completely reprogrammable on the fly by the user. For example, on a button click on the root window, some users might want to start a menu process, and some users might want to make an icon selection box. Or, on a window map event, some users might want reparent the window into a frame, and some users might want to position the window to tile nicely with all the other windows on the screen, but leave it frameless (a la Ratpoison). Some actions, such as clicking and dragging on a frame window, might want to communicate with the window management server (tell it to move or resize the window). In this case, the script would need access to the client library, so it could send signals to the server.

Client Examples:

• Menus would be standalone programs which would be executed by the event handling scripts. Or, they could be coded into the scripts directly. Large possiblities are open here. It would be possible, of course, and perhaps preferable, to create a program which took as an argument the name of a menu-describing file, then read and parsed that file to populate the menu. This would enable the creation and editing of menus without any sort of programming overhead. Additionally, a graphical menu editor could be written with ease in this scenario.
• Frames would similarly be implemented by standalone programs. Whenever a window is mapped on the screen, the event handler would (for example) call a new program. This program could then create a frame window, and ask the wm (via the client lib) to associate it with the newly mapped window. A good frame manager might cache frames, so that if a window is unmapped (e.g. by being iconified) and remapped, the frame would not need to be regenerated. Frames could be managed on a per-window basis, or held constant over all windows, depending on the program. Additionally, a frame manager could be written that would understand and use any number of different window manager’s themes. For example, an Enlightenment theme, or blackbox theme frame manager could be written.
• Users would be free to run gnome-panel, or kicker, or any other panel/toolbar/menubar of their choosing (or writing!). Of course, one benefit to running well-established toolbars would be the number of applets already available.
• When a window is iconified, an icon manager could be notified, and add that window to its icon list. Or, a window list could be notified whenever the virtual workspace changes, and only display windows present in that workspace (a la gnome’s window list applet).
• A config dialog could be created using the client lib, or, using the various scripting language bindings and an interpreter, it would be easily possible to control the window manager interactively.

A number of these clients would be written as part of the PyWM project, but would not be part of the PyWM distribution itself. They would instead have their own separate distributions, as befits separate projects. Some packagers might choose to bundle a number of clients along with PyWM itself, but that would naturally be up to their discretion.

I think that this is very much in the spirit of unix development as a whole (do one thing well, and not anything else at all), as well as being closest to what I’ve been looking for in a window manager.

What’s the Python Scenario?

I’ve taken the FLWM window manager and wrapped it into a Python module as a ‘window manager engine’.

You drive PYWM by creating a subclass of the basic pywm.WM window manager class. If you want even more per-window control, you can subclass the pywm.window class as well. Plenty of examples in the PYWM distribution you can use as a starting point.

If you like, why not browse the documentation online?

Within your derived classes, you write event handlers, which receive all kinds of window manager related events, and within the event handler methods, can pick from a large range of actions.

The PyWM API is kept clean, simple and intuitive. So you won’t be dragging your ass through unreadable source code and incomplete/inaccurate documentation for hours just to figure out how to do basic stuff. There are some programmers who get a perverse rush from making their APIs as complicated and obscure as possible. For example, in raw X, it takes 12 args to a function to get just the title of a window! But that’s not how I work.

Within your handlers, you can:

• Move/resize windows
• Hide/Show/Close windows
• Launch other apps
• Switch between desktops
• Dynamically bind, rebind and unbind keystrokes
• Create screen ‘hotspots’ and ‘hot-edges’ — which are activated when the mouse goes to an area on the screen (or clicks there).
• Set timers to fire your own callbacks — once or repeatedly

Your handlers can receive events, such as:

• Window manager startup
• Window gets created
• Window gets destroyed
• Mouse enters a window
• Window gets moved or resized
• Custom key sequence is received
• Mouse click is received
• Timers (set by yourself)

In contrast to other Python-driven window managers, this one is so easy and intuitive that you’ll be hacking your own window manager script in a couple of minutes. A set of easily-undersood example scripts is included with the distribution.

Caveat — due to some quirks in Pyrex, some exceptions may not appear on stdout — if things ever look weird, just sprinkle in a few print statements while debugging, until you figure out what’s happening.

Also, while you’re testing/debugging your Python script, you’re best advised to put ‘xterm’ in your .xinitrc, and launch your script manually within the xterm window, or, even better from a virtual console.

What Do I Need?

greg/python/Pyrex/ (only if building from source)

FLTK version 1.0 (the new release should work with 1.1, which is distributed with debian at least) — available from here on the FLTK homepage (only if building from source)

libstdc++

(xlibmesa3)

(libgl1)

libc6

xlibs-dev (only if building from source)

The Leo metastructural code editor (optional) — makes the source much more understandable

Note — if your system has glibc 2.2 or later , and Python 2.2.1 or later ,
you can save yourself the need to download/install/compile FLTK 1.0 and Pyrex,
and use the the orignal 0.1 tarball, link below
(not recommended,
though I will probably release binaries in the future, especially if requested. ).

Where’s It At?

PyWM is in a prototype state, but it’s working well enough to offer for download and review.

Be warned that if your scripting has errors, it can take the X server down with it, killing off your apps and causing possible loss of data.

There may also be bugs in the FLWM core, or in the PyWM code, which cause stability problems as well.

So if you want to play around with PyWM, please observe the following:

While working on your scripts, write your

/.xinitrc file to launch xterm (or your favourite console window). Then, launch your PyWM script from within a virtual console. That way, if your script crashes (and doesn’t take down X), you can fix it and re-launch it

Never, NEVER have any applications open with important data while you’re working on your PyWM scripts. Don’t trust your script until you’ve tested it thoroughly.

When running other applications within your PyWM environment, be sure to save your data often.

If you see any really weird and unexplainable things happening on your desktop, or apps refusing to run, try restarting the X server. If this doesn’t work, try rebooting.